Anatomy is the study of the structure and organization of the body. It is a fundamental subject in the medical curriculum that lays the foundation for future clinical practice. However, teaching anatomy comes with various challenges that impact both staff and students. This blog will discuss several issues in teaching anatomy, including the mental health of staff and students, the use of eponyms, teaching genital systems in binary terms only, increased teaching load and service load with decreased time for research, body dysmorphia and hygiene issues with surface anatomy, class sizes increasing, integration of subjects reduces time spent on each subject, shortage of anatomists and casualization of the university workforce, the need for anatomists and clinicians to work together, the diversity of anatomist backgrounds, the use of "Clinical Anatomist" and "Anatomist," ethics related to the use of body donor images and the source of body donor materials, commemoration ceremonies and religion, and technology's impact on teaching anatomy.
Mental Health of Staff and Students
Teaching anatomy can be stressful, with significant demands on both staff and students. The pressure to cover the material thoroughly and ensure students understand the content can lead to long hours and high workload. This can result in increased stress levels and negatively impact mental health. Additionally, working with body donors can be emotionally taxing, leading to anxiety and depression among staff and students. Universities can provide support services such as counseling and mental health resources. Staff and students should be encouraged to seek assistance and support from these services. Additionally, universities can provide training on self-care and stress management strategies to help staff and students manage their workload and stress levels effectively.
Use of Eponyms
The use of eponyms in anatomy has been a controversial issue. Eponyms are named after people, such as the "Circle of Willis," named after Professor Thomas Willis (1621-1675). While eponyms are useful for history, they can also lead to confusion and inconsistency in terminology. To resolve this issue, anatomists can use descriptive terms based on structure and function. Descriptive terms are more precise and universally understood, leading to clear communication between anatomists and other medical professionals. Universities can provide training on proper anatomical terminology use and discourage the use of eponyms.
Teaching Genital Systems in Binary Terms Only
Teaching genital systems in binary terms only can contribute to marginalising and stigmatising gender and sexual diversity. It reinforces a binary gender system and does not acknowledge the existence of non-binary and intersex individuals. To tackle this issue, anatomists should be trained to teach genital systems in a way that acknowledges and respects gender and sexual diversity. This can include using inclusive language and discussing the anatomical variations that exist. Universities should also provide training on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) to staff and students to promote a more inclusive learning environment.
Increased Teaching Load and Service Load with Decreased Time for Research
Increased teaching and service load with decreased time for research can lead to decreased quality of research and lack of innovation. Teaching and service load can be demanding, leaving little time for research and professional development. To handle these issues, universities can provide funding and support for research activities, as well as reduce the teaching and service load of staff. This can provide opportunities for staff to engage in research and professional development, leading to increased innovation and improved quality of research.
Body Dysmorphia and Hygiene Issues with Surface Anatomy
Teaching surface anatomy can be challenging due to hygiene concerns and body dysmorphia. Students may feel uncomfortable removing clothing, wearing tight clothing, or touching other peoples' bodies and may have a distorted perception of their own bodies. To engage with this issue, universities can provide paid professional models and ensure that sanitisers are available. Equipment should be sanitised between each use. Staff can also be encouraged to provide a safe and comfortable learning environment for students by placing emphasis consent, normal representative bodies of the general population, plus healthy eating and exercise.
Class Sizes Increasing
The increasing class sizes in anatomy courses can result in decreased interaction between students and staff, leading to a less personalized learning experience. This can also lead to difficulties in providing individualized feedback and assessing student understanding. Universities can provide smaller class sizes or allocate more resources to anatomy courses to address this issue. Technology can also be used to facilitate interactive learning experiences, such as virtual dissections and interactive software. Staff can also provide office hours and one-on-one sessions to support students' individual needs.
Integration of Subjects Reduces Time Spent on Each Subject
The integration of anatomy with other subjects in the medical curriculum can result in reduced time spent on anatomy-specific content. This can lead to a lack of depth in understanding and difficulty in integrating anatomical knowledge with other subjects. Universities can provide dedicated anatomy courses or allocate more time for anatomy-specific content in integrated courses to resolve this issue. Staff can also collaborate with other departments to ensure anatomical knowledge is reinforced in other subjects.
Shortage of Anatomists and Casualization of the University Workforce
The shortage of anatomists and the casualisation of the university workforce can result in staff with inadequate training and experience, leading to decreased quality of education. This can also result in increased workload and reduced support for students. To address this issue, universities can provide support for staff to receive training and professional development opportunities. Funding and resources can also be allocated to attract and retain qualified anatomists. Additionally, universities can provide support for staff to engage in research and professional development to maintain the quality of education.
Anatomists and Clinicians Need to Work Together
The collaboration between anatomists and clinicians is crucial for the integration of anatomical knowledge into clinical practice. However, communication barriers and conflicting priorities can impede this collaboration. Universities can provide opportunities for collaboration between anatomists and clinicians, such as joint research projects and interdisciplinary courses. Staff can also be trained in communication and collaboration skills to facilitate effective communication and teamwork.
Anatomists Have Diverse Backgrounds, Is One Background More Superior?
Anatomists come from diverse educational and professional backgrounds, including biology, medicine, and allied health. However, there is no evidence that one background is superior to others in teaching anatomy. Universities can provide support for staff to receive training and professional development opportunities, regardless of their educational background. Staff can also collaborate with other departments to enhance their anatomical knowledge and understanding.
Why Do Some Anatomists Use "Clinical Anatomist" and Some Just Use "Anatomist"?
The use of "Clinical Anatomist" and "Anatomist" can indicate differences in professional roles and responsibilities. "Clinical Anatomist" typically refers to staff who have a clinical background and are involved in the integration of anatomical knowledge into clinical practice. "Anatomist" typically refers to staff who focus on teaching and research in anatomical science. To clarify this issue, universities can provide correct classification of professional titles and roles to ensure students and staff understand their responsibilities and expectations.
Ethics - Use of Body Donor Images, Source of Body Donor Materials
The use of body donor images and the source of body donor materials can raise ethical concerns related to consent and respect for the deceased. Additionally, the use of body donors from marginalized populations can contribute to social injustice and discrimination. Universities can provide training on ethical considerations related to the use of body donors and ensure that proper consent and respect for the deceased are observed. Universities can also prioritize the use of body donors from diverse populations to promote social justice and inclusivity.
Commemoration Ceremonies and Religion
Commemoration ceremonies and religious beliefs can affect the use of body donor materials and the teaching of anatomy. Some religions and cultures have specific beliefs regarding the handling of the deceased and the use of body donors. Universities can engage with commemoration as culturally-appropriate and provide accommodations for students and staff with specific religious beliefs regarding the use of body donors. Universities can also provide alternative learning materials and resources for students who cannot participate in body donor-based dissection.
Technology - Access, Use, Distribution, Ethics
Technology can enhance the teaching of anatomy by providing interactive learning experiences and access to diverse anatomical resources. However, technology can also raise ethical concerns related to data privacy and accessibility. Universities should provide guidelines and policies for the ethical use and distribution of technology in anatomy education. Staff can also receive training on the use and integration of technology in teaching anatomy.
Conclusion
Teaching anatomy is a complex process that involves multiple issues related to staff and student mental health, eponyms, teaching binary genital systems, increased teaching load, body dysmorphia and hygiene issues, class size, subject integration, shortage of anatomists, collaboration between anatomists and clinicians, diverse educational backgrounds, professional titles, ethical considerations related to the use of body donors, commemoration ceremonies and religion, and technology use.
To address these issues, universities can provide training and professional development opportunities for staff, allocate resources to support anatomy education, collaborate with other departments, prioritize diversity and inclusivity, and develop guidelines and policies for ethical practice in anatomy education. By addressing these issues, universities can promote high-quality anatomy education that prepares students for clinical practice while prioritizing the well-being and ethical considerations of all involved.
Comments